Clarity Over Cleverness

Readability, Dyslexia, and Why I Use Manrope

Font choice might seem like a minor design decision, but on math worksheets, it has a real impact on how students access content. Math already asks learners to juggle numbers, symbols, and procedures. If the text itself is hard to read, students are using cognitive energy on decoding instead of problem-solving.

That is why I consistently use Manrope for my math materials.

Readability Comes First

Manrope is a clean, modern sans-serif font with open letterforms and consistent spacing. Numbers are clearly shaped, symbols are easy to distinguish, and lines of text do not feel crowded. This helps students scan problems quickly and reduces visual fatigue, especially during longer practice sessions or assessments.

Supporting Students with Dyslexia

For students with dyslexia, font choice can significantly affect readability. Fonts with tight spacing, decorative strokes, or similar-looking letters can increase visual confusion and slow comprehension.

Manrope supports dyslexic readers by offering:

• Clear distinctions between commonly confused characters such as 1, l, and I
• Even stroke weight that reduces visual noise
• Generous spacing that helps letters and numbers remain visually separate

No font can fix dyslexia, but choosing a clean, predictable font removes barriers that have nothing to do with math understanding. The goal is not to add an accommodation, but to make default materials easier for more students to access.

Why I Do Not Default to OpenDyslexic

OpenDyslexic is often recommended for dyslexic readers, and for some students it can be helpful. However, research on dyslexia-specific fonts shows mixed results. Many studies suggest that spacing, simplicity, and consistency matter more than specialized letter shapes.

In classroom practice, OpenDyslexic can also:

• Slow reading for some students due to heavier letterforms
• Feel visually distracting or unfamiliar
• Make worksheets look inconsistent across subjects

Manrope offers many of the same accessibility benefits without drawing attention to the font itself. This helps materials feel inclusive rather than special or different.

Calm, Age-Appropriate Design

Many fonts designed for clarity end up looking juvenile. Manrope strikes a balance by feeling friendly and approachable without appearing childish. This matters for upper elementary and middle school students who want materials that feel age-appropriate and respectful.

Consistency Builds Confidence

When worksheets look predictable and uncluttered, students know where to look and what to expect. Consistent font use reduces cognitive load, which is especially important for students with attention challenges, dyslexia, or processing differences.

A Research-Based Perspective

Educational research consistently shows that clear typography, adequate spacing, and high contrast improve readability for all learners, not just students with identified learning differences. Accessible design benefits everyone, and thoughtful font choices help ensure that mistakes reflect math understanding rather than visual confusion.

Design Should Get Out of the Way

Good worksheet design should not be noticeable. The best font is one students forget about entirely because it allows them to focus on the math. Manrope helps me do exactly that.

When people say a student is “good at math,” they often mean fast, confident, or immediately correct. The student who finishes first. The one whose hand is always up. The one who rarely seems unsure.

But after more than 25 years of teaching and tutoring all ages, I’ve learned that those surface traits tell us very little about mathematical understanding.

Being good at math is not about speed.

Speed is a skill, and for some students it comes naturally. For others, it develops later, or not at all—and that does not limit their ability to think mathematically. In fact, some of the deepest thinkers I’ve worked with were slow, careful, and deliberate. They took time to read a problem closely, to test an idea, to reconsider their approach.

They didn’t rush. They reasoned.

Being good at math is also not about always being right.

Students who are always correct often stay within what feels safe. They rely on familiar procedures, avoid risks, and hesitate to explore new strategies that might lead to mistakes. While accuracy matters, growth comes from being willing to try something that might not work the first time.

Mathematics is full of false starts, revisions, and moments of confusion. Those moments are not evidence of weakness—they are evidence that real thinking is happening.

Being good at math means being willing to be uncomfortable.

It means sitting with uncertainty long enough for patterns to emerge. It means puzzling through a problem, testing an idea, and adjusting when something doesn’t make sense. It means becoming familiar with numbers, relationships, and logic through repeated exposure and reflection.

This kind of thinking takes time. It requires patience, persistence, and support.

In the classroom, I want students to understand that struggle is not failure. Struggle is often the work. The goal is not instant correctness, but the ability to say, “I don’t see it yet—but I can figure it out.”

As a teacher, a tutor, and a parent, I’ve seen how powerful this mindset can be. When students stop measuring themselves by speed or perfection, they begin to take ownership of their thinking. They ask better questions. They explain their reasoning more clearly. They become more confident—not because math suddenly feels easy, but because it feels possible.

That belief shapes how I teach and how I design math resources. I prioritize clarity over cleverness, space to show thinking, and problems that reward reasoning rather than rushing. I want materials that support students in developing familiarity and confidence over time, not quick tricks that disappear under pressure.

Every child can be good at math. Not by being the fastest or the first—but by being willing to think, explore, and persist.